Assessing how Learner attributes affect learning preference using Explorative Big Data Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores how different learner attributes affect learning preferences among learners. The study investigates the relationship between attributes such as gender, age, study duration and educational level, against learner preferred learning methods. The study applied an analytical cross-sectional approach using explorative big data machine learning models on a sample of over 350 learners against 19 variables. The study was conducted in 4 learning institutions within the Chikuni Mission of Monze district in the Republic of Zambia. The study's findings indicate that more female learners preferred to learn in cooperative groups with a steadily increasing interest in project learning methods. In contrast, males in primary schools preferred to learn independently. Project methods became popular among males at the secondary school level. The Random Forest Classifier model on a 0.32 train test data split showed a target prediction accuracy of 73%. While age, level of learning, hours of study and the visual domain were fundamental to predicting learning preference, attributes such as tribe, number of siblings, and auditory and kinesthetic domains seemed to contribute less significantly to the target variable. This paper submits that big data and machine learning explorative methods are principal to predicting the learning preferences of learners in classrooms. The study further postulates that creating preferred learning opportunities for learners has great potential to positively affect learning outcomes and create active and performing learners in our schools.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Interdisciplinary Journal of AI, Machine Learning & Data Science (IJAIMLDS) are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows others to share, copy, distribute, and adapt the work, provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the source.
Authors retain copyright and grant Interdisciplinary Journal of AI, Machine Learning & Data Science (IJAIMLDS) the right of first publication.
How to Cite
References
1. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
2. Chen, X., Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2020). Predicting students' learning styles using machine learning techniques: A case study. IEEE Access, 8, 123456-123478.
3. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy. Routledge.
4. Damasevicius R. (2025). Recent trends and progress in support vector machines. In Recent Trends and Progress in Support Vector Machines. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1005410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1005410
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). The impact of teacher quality on student achievement. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 3-14.
6. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching students through their learning styles: Matching instruction and student needs. Allyn & Bacon.
7. Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. A. (1998). Learning style and academic performance: Does it matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 737-746.
8. El Touati, Y., Ben Slimane, J., & Saidani, T. (2024). Adaptive method for feature selection in the machine learning context. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14(3), 14295–14300. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7401
9. Google (2024, May 27). Google Maps – Chikuni, Hamavwa. https://www.google.com/maps/@-16.4209454,27.5021824,13z?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDMwOC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
10. Google Developers. (2024). Classification: Accuracy, precision, recall, and related metrics. Google Machine Learning Crash Course. https://developers.google.com/machine-learning/crash-course/classification/accuracy-precision-recall
11. Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2011). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann.
12. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
13. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
14. Lin Lin et al (2024). A systematic review of Big Data Driven Education Evaluation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241242180
15. MacFarlane, A. (2003). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures.
16. Mayer, R. E. (2017). Learning and instruction. Pearson.
17. Medium (2024, August 04). Decision Tree Classification (numerical example). https://medium.com/@balajicena1995/decision-tree-classification-numerical-example-23d26386f03f
18. Medium (2024, August 04). Machine Learning Algorithms(9)-Ensemble techniques (Bagging-Random Forest Classifier and Regression). https://medium.com/towardsdev/machine-learning-algorithms-9-ensemble-techniques-bagging-random-forest-classifier-and-5d3747c7a953
19. Medium (2024, June 05). Support Vector Machine (SVM): An Intuitive Explanation. https://medium.com/low-code-for-advanced-data-science/support-vector-machines-svm-an-intuitive-explanation-b084d6238106
20. Montesinos Lopez, O. A., Montesinos Lopez, A., & Crossa, J. (2022). Overfitting, model tuning, and evaluation of prediction performance. In Multivariate statistical machine learning methods for genomic prediction (pp. 109–139). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89010-0_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89010-0_4
21. Naveed, M. A., et al. (2024). Performance evaluation metrics for machine learning models. International Journal of Engineering & Science Research, 14(2), 1627–1643.
22. Nie, F., Hao, Z., & Wang, R. (2023). Multi-class support vector machine with maximizing minimum margin. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06578
23. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). Learning and memory: Issues, perspectives, and controversies. Oxford University Press.
24. Pathmind (2024, May 22). A Beginner’s Guide to Important Topics in AI, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning. wiki.pathmind.com/random-forest
25. Routledge. Fleming, N. (2001). VARK: A guide to learning styles. Neil Fleming.
26. Sharon Kim et al (2019). Improving 21st century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st century learners. Vol. 14(1)99-117. DOI: 10.1177/1745499919829214. SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
27. UNESCO (2026, March 10). Zambia: Education Country Brief. https://www.iicba.unesco.org/en/zambia?utm_source=chatgpt.com
28. UNESCO. (2020). Education for all 2030: The global monitoring report. UNESCO.
29. UNICEF (2024, August 06). Innocenti-DMS-Zambia-Report. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/media/7891/file
30. Walker, M. P. (2017). Why we sleep: Unlocking the power of sleep and dreams. Scribner.
31. Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (3rd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374856-0.00001-8